For my humor piece, I decided to take the Onion approach and write an obnoxious, satirical article. I think it is fairly clear what I am trying to do, and I think my article conveys my point. I think there is always room for improvement, and that is what I am looking for the most. Where are the spots that need clarification? What is confusing?
I know there are some little things I need to address like word choice and things of that nature, but overall, I am looking for feedback on how effective my argument is. Also, what needs to be changed to make it more effective.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Good job. The piece stays true to the Onion's tone and style.
ReplyDeletei think it is in accordance to the style that is used by the onion and i think it is funny and goes in accordance with the issue you are addressing
ReplyDeletei dont know what else you could change because i really liked it
good job
This was hilarious! I love the "Rick the Electrician" harkening back to "Joe the Plumber." I think that the point was made and the article was effective. It really did seem just like an article from the Onion. I did't really notice areas that needed improvement, everything really seemed to make sense. Well done!
ReplyDeleteI think your article is in line with the satirical style and I think it was really good to poke fun at the BCS issue in this way. I really don't know much about the issue, but I am assuming that a lot of people have been complaining about the lack of a playoff system (I'm not sure if I have that right), but I like how you exaggerated the issue to point where Obama cares about it. I personally don't see any problems with it. Good job.
ReplyDelete