This has been a long, but fun process. As a journalism major, it is clear to see why I like this portfolio a lot, and I like the way it started and the connections that were made from there.
I felt like my letter to the editor obviously related to the original article I read that created my argument. My Op-Ed mirrored many of the same points and arguments I made in the letter to the editor.
My humor piece, which was like an Onion article, totally blew my issue out of proportion and it highly exaggerated everything about it. I liked doing this the best because it was SO ridiculous.
In the end, there were a lot of edits and drafts, and I think the relation was made, from piece to piece. I liked the transition from one part of the portfolio to the next, and I think it is smooth going from letter to the editor, to Op-Ed, to finally The Onion. I think I made all the necessary changes to make my arguments and overall pieces the most effective they can be.
Monday, April 27, 2009
Wednesday, April 22, 2009
Humor Piece
April 22, 2009
White House Blows Off Iraq and Economy for Football
Washington D.C.—In a surprising move last week, President Obama and his cabinet “officially threw in the towel” on the pressing, never ending sagas that are the economic crisis and the Iraq War. A person close to the the president said that Obama did this because his attention is desperately required elsewhere.
“America wants to see a playoff in college football, and I intend to work without sleep until the American people get what they want,” Obama said.
This issue has become important to the president because it looks like this is only the thing he can fix for the American people after the previous administration screwed everything up.
Obama has had ideas in mind to fix this most serious problem that is the BCS. During his campaign, he was asked about this issue, and he fired back with a fairly good idea that involved a playoff system.
“You know, when it comes down to it, college football needs to have a playoff, and I think 16 teams would be a great number to decide who the national champion is,” Obama said.
Questions on energy, Iraq, and the economy were deemed not important during this, and many of his interviews throughout the campaign.
There are several out there who do not agree with Obama. Well, everyone agrees with his idea, but some do not like the fact that he is spending all of his time focusing on this issue. Rick Sampson, an electrician from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania is one of these opponents.
“I just think the president is not dividing up his time equally, and I think our country has so many more pressing issues than the state of college football,” Sampson said.
Obama does not ignore his critics, like Rick the electrician, and when asked about him, the president responded warmly saying: “Well, last time I checked, I was the president, and you know, if a light bulb in the Oval Office shorts out, I’ll give Rick a call,” Obama said.
It is a bit unfortunate that Obama is receiving the brunt of the criticism because this not all his fault. Those closest to the president, including Vice President Joe Biden, are more than responsible too. In his short time in office, Obama has been upset to find out that the role of the president is swayed by the opinions of those with the most money.
“Right now, the supporters of the president and his administration are highly focused and concerned with the horrible state of college football and it’s that simple,” a source close to the White House said.
One thing is for sure, the president has a lot on his plate, and that is something that will never change. Though he is not praised by all for his decision to focus on other matters that have dominated presidential agendas in the past, I commend him for getting tough on college football and trying to bring change to a sport that desperately needs it.Ø
White House Blows Off Iraq and Economy for Football
Washington D.C.—In a surprising move last week, President Obama and his cabinet “officially threw in the towel” on the pressing, never ending sagas that are the economic crisis and the Iraq War. A person close to the the president said that Obama did this because his attention is desperately required elsewhere.
“America wants to see a playoff in college football, and I intend to work without sleep until the American people get what they want,” Obama said.
This issue has become important to the president because it looks like this is only the thing he can fix for the American people after the previous administration screwed everything up.
Obama has had ideas in mind to fix this most serious problem that is the BCS. During his campaign, he was asked about this issue, and he fired back with a fairly good idea that involved a playoff system.
“You know, when it comes down to it, college football needs to have a playoff, and I think 16 teams would be a great number to decide who the national champion is,” Obama said.
Questions on energy, Iraq, and the economy were deemed not important during this, and many of his interviews throughout the campaign.
There are several out there who do not agree with Obama. Well, everyone agrees with his idea, but some do not like the fact that he is spending all of his time focusing on this issue. Rick Sampson, an electrician from Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania is one of these opponents.
“I just think the president is not dividing up his time equally, and I think our country has so many more pressing issues than the state of college football,” Sampson said.
Obama does not ignore his critics, like Rick the electrician, and when asked about him, the president responded warmly saying: “Well, last time I checked, I was the president, and you know, if a light bulb in the Oval Office shorts out, I’ll give Rick a call,” Obama said.
It is a bit unfortunate that Obama is receiving the brunt of the criticism because this not all his fault. Those closest to the president, including Vice President Joe Biden, are more than responsible too. In his short time in office, Obama has been upset to find out that the role of the president is swayed by the opinions of those with the most money.
“Right now, the supporters of the president and his administration are highly focused and concerned with the horrible state of college football and it’s that simple,” a source close to the White House said.
One thing is for sure, the president has a lot on his plate, and that is something that will never change. Though he is not praised by all for his decision to focus on other matters that have dominated presidential agendas in the past, I commend him for getting tough on college football and trying to bring change to a sport that desperately needs it.Ø
Humor Author's Note
For my humor piece, I decided to take the Onion approach and write an obnoxious, satirical article. I think it is fairly clear what I am trying to do, and I think my article conveys my point. I think there is always room for improvement, and that is what I am looking for the most. Where are the spots that need clarification? What is confusing?
I know there are some little things I need to address like word choice and things of that nature, but overall, I am looking for feedback on how effective my argument is. Also, what needs to be changed to make it more effective.
I know there are some little things I need to address like word choice and things of that nature, but overall, I am looking for feedback on how effective my argument is. Also, what needs to be changed to make it more effective.
Monday, April 20, 2009
Humor Argument
In my humor piece of my editorial portfolio, I took a sort of Onion, satirical approach. I made everything up, and I think the source of my humor was extreme exaggeration. I feel like I will need to go back and make some things more obvious and develop what is already there a bit more.
I do like writing like this, and I think it is fun, but where as I am used to writing straightforward and legit, this was a tough switch. Though, I do like doing this and I think it was a lot of fun. Some places are a bit rough, but like I said, I think the substance is there.
I do like writing like this, and I think it is fun, but where as I am used to writing straightforward and legit, this was a tough switch. Though, I do like doing this and I think it was a lot of fun. Some places are a bit rough, but like I said, I think the substance is there.
Wednesday, April 15, 2009
Sample of Humor
I found a political cartoon that is poking fun at the BCS. In it, a man makes a long statement of how difficult and uncompromising an entity is, and a couple of people overhear this statement; one thinks he is talking about the current situation in the Middle East, only to find out by the other person that the statement is concerning the BCS.
It is extremely humorous to one that is familiar with the BCS system, and the humor stems from the criticisms of the the current post season system in college football. Also, for a fan it is somewhat accurate to make this statement because at times, the BCS can be as confusing and difficult as the escalating situation in the Middle East.
Of course, in the level of importance and seriousness is nowhere near that of the Middle East, but it is still funny to make that comparison.
It is extremely humorous to one that is familiar with the BCS system, and the humor stems from the criticisms of the the current post season system in college football. Also, for a fan it is somewhat accurate to make this statement because at times, the BCS can be as confusing and difficult as the escalating situation in the Middle East.
Of course, in the level of importance and seriousness is nowhere near that of the Middle East, but it is still funny to make that comparison.
Monday, April 13, 2009
Author's Note for Op-Ed
In my first draft of my Op-Ed, I think it is fairly solid. I do think there might be some places that I need to clarify by adding more specific details in. However, I do not want to flood my piece with facts and statistics. Other things are just the basics, like grammar, word choice, and flow. I think flow is the biggest thing. Is it to the point, concise, and does it grab the reader's attention.
These are the biggest things I am looking for, and other than that, I think it is a good first draft. Of course, if there is anything else that you all see, then please suggest in the text or let me know via email.
These are the biggest things I am looking for, and other than that, I think it is a good first draft. Of course, if there is anything else that you all see, then please suggest in the text or let me know via email.
Tuesday, April 7, 2009
Prewriting for OP-ED
Audience for Op-Ed:
TCU, specifically students.
Venue: The TCU Daily Skiff
The general tone is argumentative, but with support. In the four op-ed pieces I read from the Daily Skiff, all were arguing for their point, whether it was for the legalization of marijuana or the elimination of hassleing celebrity moms. However, these arguments were supported with good concrete evidence, which added support and substance for the writer’s argument. It is interesting how short they were. The pieces ranged from 300-400 words, and for that small amount of space, they all seemed to get their individual points across.
My topic covers the proposed plan to take the place of the current “post season” system, the BCS. I would like to take it and really focus on the fairness of this new plan, and truthfully, will it be any better than the current one right now. This new idea involves having a committee decide the eight teams that get to compete in a playoff for a national champuionship, and I wonder how this idea is not going to be just as arbitrary as the current BCS system. I think adding evidence of teams who have just missed the cut in the past should beef up my argument, and with all of these good teams, how does one pick one over the other…how will this new system be different…focusing on the fairness aspect should allow for some great discussion.
There will obviously be some great consideration and deliberation about this proposed idea, but just saying that will not be good enough. Each conference will have to check out this proposed idea from the MWC, and really and truly ask the tough questions. What has halted ideas in the past, and what just might kill this one is money. All the bowl games, from the biggest, like the Rose Bowl and Orange Bowl, to the smallest, like the Papa John’s Bowl and the Poinsettia Bowl, ALL bring in tons of money for schools, the venues, and sponsors. It is going to be extremely difficult and near impossible to have this cash flow be unaffected if college football goes from having over 30 bowls, to seven bowls. Significant money will be lost, and that is not okay for sponsors, venues, or schools.
I think all the rhetorical appeals will be covered, but I think I will focus on pathos and logos the most. It happens virtually every year: someone’s team gets left out because of some stupid loophole, and instead of cheering for their team in a championship game, they have to watch them play a meaningless game, where instead of national praise and glory, they get to play for a gym bag filled with sweatshirts and an iPod nano. I think college students on this campus will identify most with this because their school, might finally have a way to avoid getting the shaft year in and year out. Logos will be useful because there will still need to be facts presented. You argument based on opinions can only take you so far. There must be concrete evidence to support my claims, and I intend to do that.
I think I touched on this in the last answer, but personal experience will definitely play a huge role because like I said, everyone has been disappointed because of a stupid rule that has prevented their team from going to the big show. Concrete evidence will ultimately be the best source because it is extremely hard to argue with facts that back your claims. Also, talking about previous plans in college football and why this system has yet to be replaced will add further backing to my points.
I think the only research I need to do concerns specifics with regard to teams who have “gotten the shaft” and not gone to a bowl because of an unfair rule. Texas Tech, Texas, TCU, Utah, and others have all received a harsh end to an excellent season. Looking up more details on the proposed plan might help as well.
TCU, specifically students.
Venue: The TCU Daily Skiff
The general tone is argumentative, but with support. In the four op-ed pieces I read from the Daily Skiff, all were arguing for their point, whether it was for the legalization of marijuana or the elimination of hassleing celebrity moms. However, these arguments were supported with good concrete evidence, which added support and substance for the writer’s argument. It is interesting how short they were. The pieces ranged from 300-400 words, and for that small amount of space, they all seemed to get their individual points across.
My topic covers the proposed plan to take the place of the current “post season” system, the BCS. I would like to take it and really focus on the fairness of this new plan, and truthfully, will it be any better than the current one right now. This new idea involves having a committee decide the eight teams that get to compete in a playoff for a national champuionship, and I wonder how this idea is not going to be just as arbitrary as the current BCS system. I think adding evidence of teams who have just missed the cut in the past should beef up my argument, and with all of these good teams, how does one pick one over the other…how will this new system be different…focusing on the fairness aspect should allow for some great discussion.
There will obviously be some great consideration and deliberation about this proposed idea, but just saying that will not be good enough. Each conference will have to check out this proposed idea from the MWC, and really and truly ask the tough questions. What has halted ideas in the past, and what just might kill this one is money. All the bowl games, from the biggest, like the Rose Bowl and Orange Bowl, to the smallest, like the Papa John’s Bowl and the Poinsettia Bowl, ALL bring in tons of money for schools, the venues, and sponsors. It is going to be extremely difficult and near impossible to have this cash flow be unaffected if college football goes from having over 30 bowls, to seven bowls. Significant money will be lost, and that is not okay for sponsors, venues, or schools.
I think all the rhetorical appeals will be covered, but I think I will focus on pathos and logos the most. It happens virtually every year: someone’s team gets left out because of some stupid loophole, and instead of cheering for their team in a championship game, they have to watch them play a meaningless game, where instead of national praise and glory, they get to play for a gym bag filled with sweatshirts and an iPod nano. I think college students on this campus will identify most with this because their school, might finally have a way to avoid getting the shaft year in and year out. Logos will be useful because there will still need to be facts presented. You argument based on opinions can only take you so far. There must be concrete evidence to support my claims, and I intend to do that.
I think I touched on this in the last answer, but personal experience will definitely play a huge role because like I said, everyone has been disappointed because of a stupid rule that has prevented their team from going to the big show. Concrete evidence will ultimately be the best source because it is extremely hard to argue with facts that back your claims. Also, talking about previous plans in college football and why this system has yet to be replaced will add further backing to my points.
I think the only research I need to do concerns specifics with regard to teams who have “gotten the shaft” and not gone to a bowl because of an unfair rule. Texas Tech, Texas, TCU, Utah, and others have all received a harsh end to an excellent season. Looking up more details on the proposed plan might help as well.
Wednesday, April 1, 2009
Author's Note for Draft 1 of LTTE
In my first draft, I think I need some help with being a bit more specific about my argument. I think I do a fairly good job at explaining what is actually going on and what the problem is, but it can always be better. I think I get to the point, and I make my arguments concise and to the point.
Some feedback about weak areas would definitely help strengthen my overall argument and letter. Also, I do not think I straight up attack the author, but I do address him and the editor. So, some advice on if it is too direct with that would help.
In the end, I think the greatest help would be to know where the strong writing is and where the weak writing is. If I get feedback on that, I can replace and edit the weak points in my letter and build upon my strong areas to make the entire letter better and more effective.
Some feedback about weak areas would definitely help strengthen my overall argument and letter. Also, I do not think I straight up attack the author, but I do address him and the editor. So, some advice on if it is too direct with that would help.
In the end, I think the greatest help would be to know where the strong writing is and where the weak writing is. If I get feedback on that, I can replace and edit the weak points in my letter and build upon my strong areas to make the entire letter better and more effective.
Draft 1 of Letter to the Editor
Positive Step but No Solution
To Max Landman, editor-and-chief of the TCU Daily Skiff:
The Bowl Championship Series system in college football has had numerous critics over the years since it was established as the way to determine the national champion in college football. An article in the TCU Daily Skiff published on March 24th of this year talks about a potential solution to this problem. Justin White compares and contrasts the current BCS system and unveils the Mountain West Conference’s proposed playoff plan in his article entitled “Mountain West presents eight-team playoff proposal.” Though I believe this to be a step in the right direction for college football, I think it is only the first of many steps that needs to be taken in order to fairly determine a national champion.
White talks about how fans that have been outraged in the past can now breathe easier because of this proposed plan; I think that is a bit bold. The article gives an overview of the newly proposed plan, and although it would replace the current BCS system, a 12 member committee would not only choose the eight teams to compete for the title, but they would also seed them, one through eight. This leaves the door open for some extremely arbitrary decisions when picking one team over another. The article takes the shape that this is the solution to a huge problem in college football when in reality, possibly one capricious group could be replaced by another group that is set up to have the same problems and make the same mistakes.
Like I said earlier, this is a step in the right direction, and I agree with what is said by the athletics director Danny Morrison in this article. He says this plan came about now because the MWC is doing well, not because some other BCS conferences are doing badly. The proposal is receiving praise by other conferences, but I think the MWC is ultimately trying to make their case for an automatic bid in the current BCS system. A playoff system has been discussed for years, and the various ideas have involved eight, 16, and even more teams, but the BCS continues to live on.
In the end, it is teams like the 2008 Utah Utes who get short-changed. They had a perfect season, and they won their BCS bowl game, beating an extremely well-coached and talented Alabama Crimson Tide team…why should they not get a chance to play for the national championship? There are teams like this, year in and year out, and still this problem exists. A problem that is as continuous as this one cannot be solved by a simple proposal by one conference, and I think the way this article flows, that is exactly what it is getting at. More needs to be done, and it will take some serious time for everyone in college football to settle on a fix; at least now more conferences are starting to realize that something has to change, and that truly is half the battle.
To Max Landman, editor-and-chief of the TCU Daily Skiff:
The Bowl Championship Series system in college football has had numerous critics over the years since it was established as the way to determine the national champion in college football. An article in the TCU Daily Skiff published on March 24th of this year talks about a potential solution to this problem. Justin White compares and contrasts the current BCS system and unveils the Mountain West Conference’s proposed playoff plan in his article entitled “Mountain West presents eight-team playoff proposal.” Though I believe this to be a step in the right direction for college football, I think it is only the first of many steps that needs to be taken in order to fairly determine a national champion.
White talks about how fans that have been outraged in the past can now breathe easier because of this proposed plan; I think that is a bit bold. The article gives an overview of the newly proposed plan, and although it would replace the current BCS system, a 12 member committee would not only choose the eight teams to compete for the title, but they would also seed them, one through eight. This leaves the door open for some extremely arbitrary decisions when picking one team over another. The article takes the shape that this is the solution to a huge problem in college football when in reality, possibly one capricious group could be replaced by another group that is set up to have the same problems and make the same mistakes.
Like I said earlier, this is a step in the right direction, and I agree with what is said by the athletics director Danny Morrison in this article. He says this plan came about now because the MWC is doing well, not because some other BCS conferences are doing badly. The proposal is receiving praise by other conferences, but I think the MWC is ultimately trying to make their case for an automatic bid in the current BCS system. A playoff system has been discussed for years, and the various ideas have involved eight, 16, and even more teams, but the BCS continues to live on.
In the end, it is teams like the 2008 Utah Utes who get short-changed. They had a perfect season, and they won their BCS bowl game, beating an extremely well-coached and talented Alabama Crimson Tide team…why should they not get a chance to play for the national championship? There are teams like this, year in and year out, and still this problem exists. A problem that is as continuous as this one cannot be solved by a simple proposal by one conference, and I think the way this article flows, that is exactly what it is getting at. More needs to be done, and it will take some serious time for everyone in college football to settle on a fix; at least now more conferences are starting to realize that something has to change, and that truly is half the battle.
Monday, March 30, 2009
My Article for the Editorial Portfolio
I am going to do my editorial on the proposed MWC playoff plan that could potentially take the place of the current BCS system. I found this article in the daily skiff, and I am passionate about it because this could help the Horned Frogs get a chance to play in a GREAT bowl game each year. In my letter to the editor, my response is one that will agree and disagree with the proposed plan. Essentially, this is a good start to a fair and exciting playoff system, but there are still many holes in this plan.
I plan to support my stance with my own experiences season to season that end with a great team getting left out of the mix because an automatic bid trumps a near perfect season for a team from a lesser conference.
I plan to support my stance with my own experiences season to season that end with a great team getting left out of the mix because an automatic bid trumps a near perfect season for a team from a lesser conference.
Wednesday, March 25, 2009
Topic Exploration for Editorial Portfolio
I want to write a letter to the editor agreeing with an article that was written in the Daily Skiff about the Mountain West Conference playoff proposal. The MWC Board of Directors came up with the idea and it has received support from other conferences around the country. This type of idea is definitely needed because year after year in college football a team is left out of the mix. The current system, the Bowl Championship Series is just not sufficient enough.
I think this topic is good because there is enough here to respond back to the article, create my own op-ed piece, and make a creative cartoon, mock article, etc for this portfolio. I am also extremely interested in this issue because I am a huge sports fan. I have seen how messed up the current system can be, so I would love to see a change.
I think this topic is good because there is enough here to respond back to the article, create my own op-ed piece, and make a creative cartoon, mock article, etc for this portfolio. I am also extremely interested in this issue because I am a huge sports fan. I have seen how messed up the current system can be, so I would love to see a change.
Author's Note for Final Draft and Portfolio
I think my final draft is by far my best draft, as it should be. There has been a ton of rewriting and adding on to it, and I think now it is complete. From a citing standpoint, grammar, and most importantly content, it is good to go.
The balance of summary and analysis is good, and I am happy with the additions I made; the workshops were definitely primary reasons for why I did add what I did, so I am glad we had those. There are always things that can be done to make a paper better, but I worked hard, and I am happy with my final product.
The portfolio has a ton in it. It is packed with all of my drafts, charts, etc. I put a lot of effort into making sure everything was in its place and everything was accounted for. It is interesting to see the transformation from the first two body sections, to what I have now: the final product. I think a quick glance at the portfolio shows how much work and research was done, and that is exactly what a portfolio should show. There should be a gradual increase in research, effort, substance, and quality. I think all of these things are improved upon, and I am more than satisfied with the entire package.
The balance of summary and analysis is good, and I am happy with the additions I made; the workshops were definitely primary reasons for why I did add what I did, so I am glad we had those. There are always things that can be done to make a paper better, but I worked hard, and I am happy with my final product.
The portfolio has a ton in it. It is packed with all of my drafts, charts, etc. I put a lot of effort into making sure everything was in its place and everything was accounted for. It is interesting to see the transformation from the first two body sections, to what I have now: the final product. I think a quick glance at the portfolio shows how much work and research was done, and that is exactly what a portfolio should show. There should be a gradual increase in research, effort, substance, and quality. I think all of these things are improved upon, and I am more than satisfied with the entire package.
Sunday, March 22, 2009
Author's Note for Draft Three
In my third draft, I am looking for help with fine-tuning my paper. Citing issues, phrasing, word choice, and the little things like that are what I could use the most help with. I think the substance of my paper is good, and I think there is a good balance of summary and analysis. I made a few changes to y works cited, so a check over of that would be good too.
I think I am close to the end with this, and I obviously have to be too, but I am happy with where I am at this point with my third draft.
I think I am close to the end with this, and I obviously have to be too, but I am happy with where I am at this point with my third draft.
How My Rhetorical Case Study Has Developed
Having just completed my third draft of my rhetorical case study, I have seen a ton of improvement. I think this is my most complete draft, in terms of the right amount of analysis and summarizing. I feel good about the balance of the two. Starting the paper in pieces, I think now, with eight pages, my paper is filled out. It still needs some fine-tuning, but as a whole, it is there. I am happy with the flow, and how I transitioned from one point to the next, and I think from my first draft to this one, that is one thing that is definitely better.
Taking a step back, I can see I have come a long way since my first draft of two body sections. The paper went basically the way I anticipated it would, and with some finishing touches, I think it will be good. It is a lot easier to see it as a whole now, than when I just had two body sections.
Taking a step back, I can see I have come a long way since my first draft of two body sections. The paper went basically the way I anticipated it would, and with some finishing touches, I think it will be good. It is a lot easier to see it as a whole now, than when I just had two body sections.
Monday, March 9, 2009
How My Topic Impacts the Local Community
I think my topic greatly affects the local community. The success of TCU's signing day gets most on campus and the local community excited about the upcoming year. My topic is specifically geared toward the local community, and though it is getting attention nationally, the local community is the area that can most closely relate to what I am talking about.
Frankly, TCU students and the TCU supporters in the DFW area are the majority who care about this topic, and I think like me, it is getting them excited and anxious about the coming year.
I think my topic creates stir among those in the area, and that can be a powerful thing, especially come next season.
Frankly, TCU students and the TCU supporters in the DFW area are the majority who care about this topic, and I think like me, it is getting them excited and anxious about the coming year.
I think my topic creates stir among those in the area, and that can be a powerful thing, especially come next season.
Author's Note for First Draft
Completing my first draft, which ran a bit over six pages, I realize I will need to be more specific to get a full eight pages. I think what I have so far is good, and I think there is a solid balance of analysis and summary.
My citing seems to be okay, but I think that is the biggest mechanical part I need to fix and/or check over. All in all, my biggest challenge that lies ahead is expanding on what I already have to achieve the page limit. I know I have enough information, I just need some guidance to find other ways of elaborating on my topic, and also suggestions on what I might be forgetting or leaving out.
My citing seems to be okay, but I think that is the biggest mechanical part I need to fix and/or check over. All in all, my biggest challenge that lies ahead is expanding on what I already have to achieve the page limit. I know I have enough information, I just need some guidance to find other ways of elaborating on my topic, and also suggestions on what I might be forgetting or leaving out.
Wednesday, March 4, 2009
Two Body Sections
I think my approach should be effective. I plan on starting with the most local medium, and then proceeding with the more national mediums. In writing my first two body sections, I have found some similarities, but there have also been clear differences in regard to amount of devotion and coverage to the topic: TCU football recruiting.
I think the setup I am going with will allow for some great elaboration and it will be easy to compare and contrast the different sources. This is the approach I plan on taking for the whole paper, and I started with the first two body sections. I kind of set the stage, explain what each one does/offers as a source, then when all are mentioned, I can go back and forth, comparing and contrasting similarities and differences in my four sources.
This will also allow to see how truly effective each source is, and it will allow for me to analyze the overall exposure TCU received and how that has helped/hurt the program.
I think the setup I am going with will allow for some great elaboration and it will be easy to compare and contrast the different sources. This is the approach I plan on taking for the whole paper, and I started with the first two body sections. I kind of set the stage, explain what each one does/offers as a source, then when all are mentioned, I can go back and forth, comparing and contrasting similarities and differences in my four sources.
This will also allow to see how truly effective each source is, and it will allow for me to analyze the overall exposure TCU received and how that has helped/hurt the program.
Monday, March 2, 2009
Prewriting
Prewriting for Rhetorical Case Study
What connects my sources?
All of my sources focus on how TCU did in its recruiting efforts this off-season. Compared to years past, TCU has had great success, and a trend in my sources is how different recruiting is for TCU now, compared to say five years ago. TCU is now legitimately competing with the powerhouses like Texas and Oklahoma for top tier recruits. In years past, TCU had to take a back seat to schools like these, and they would have to pick over what was left behind. Now, they are getting some of the best this country has to offer, and kids are seeking TCU out more as well. All of this is mixed in all four of my sources. Some go more in depth than others, but the general ideas are definitely covered.
Summarize into two sentences or so:
TCU is becoming a major player in the recruiting process because of its consistent success in recent years. This success is allowing for TCU to compete with powerhouse schools, and actually swoop in and take recruits who might have considered bigger schools. Also, kids are starting to consider TCU themselves.
Organization Technique:
I am going to start with the smallest (local) medium, and then I will work my way up to the biggest (national) medium. Seeing how TCU’s recruiting was covered in the Daily Skiff, to the Telegram, and on to ESPN. Taking in and dissecting each one, and giving my analysis of each. Then, after all four have been covered, I would kind of take a compare and contrast approach, analyzing why coverage was the way it was, etc.
I think this approach would be effective because it covers all the bases, and it is in a consistent, almost chronological approach, from most coverage, to least, or smallest medium to biggest. It allows for separation of the sources and it still leaves an opening to come back in and tie it all back up together.
How am I going to transition from source to source?
I think the flow is going to be fairly simple because I am going to take it source by source, starting with the skiff, explain why the coverage was so big and elaborate, and then going into the Telegram article. With that, I would relate it back a bit to the Skiff article, because there is heavy coverage in both, but I would showcase the differences in the two, because a college newspaper is going to be a little bit more favorable and generic in some cases than a city newspaper, in a huge market. From there I would go into the first ESPN article, which is actually a blog. I would transition with how the coverage changes a bit, but is still quite similar, and from there to the fourth source, I would make a point to show how little coverage there is, especially compared to the first source. Mostly though, I would make it a simple transition from source to source and I would do the majority of the comparing and contrasting when I am done revealing each source. That way I could jump from local to national, and so on. It would much more confusing to do that if all sources had not been established and presented. I feel like this would create good flow that would make the paper an easy, somewhat interesting read for the reader.
What connects my sources?
All of my sources focus on how TCU did in its recruiting efforts this off-season. Compared to years past, TCU has had great success, and a trend in my sources is how different recruiting is for TCU now, compared to say five years ago. TCU is now legitimately competing with the powerhouses like Texas and Oklahoma for top tier recruits. In years past, TCU had to take a back seat to schools like these, and they would have to pick over what was left behind. Now, they are getting some of the best this country has to offer, and kids are seeking TCU out more as well. All of this is mixed in all four of my sources. Some go more in depth than others, but the general ideas are definitely covered.
Summarize into two sentences or so:
TCU is becoming a major player in the recruiting process because of its consistent success in recent years. This success is allowing for TCU to compete with powerhouse schools, and actually swoop in and take recruits who might have considered bigger schools. Also, kids are starting to consider TCU themselves.
Organization Technique:
I am going to start with the smallest (local) medium, and then I will work my way up to the biggest (national) medium. Seeing how TCU’s recruiting was covered in the Daily Skiff, to the Telegram, and on to ESPN. Taking in and dissecting each one, and giving my analysis of each. Then, after all four have been covered, I would kind of take a compare and contrast approach, analyzing why coverage was the way it was, etc.
I think this approach would be effective because it covers all the bases, and it is in a consistent, almost chronological approach, from most coverage, to least, or smallest medium to biggest. It allows for separation of the sources and it still leaves an opening to come back in and tie it all back up together.
How am I going to transition from source to source?
I think the flow is going to be fairly simple because I am going to take it source by source, starting with the skiff, explain why the coverage was so big and elaborate, and then going into the Telegram article. With that, I would relate it back a bit to the Skiff article, because there is heavy coverage in both, but I would showcase the differences in the two, because a college newspaper is going to be a little bit more favorable and generic in some cases than a city newspaper, in a huge market. From there I would go into the first ESPN article, which is actually a blog. I would transition with how the coverage changes a bit, but is still quite similar, and from there to the fourth source, I would make a point to show how little coverage there is, especially compared to the first source. Mostly though, I would make it a simple transition from source to source and I would do the majority of the comparing and contrasting when I am done revealing each source. That way I could jump from local to national, and so on. It would much more confusing to do that if all sources had not been established and presented. I feel like this would create good flow that would make the paper an easy, somewhat interesting read for the reader.
Topic Development Through More Reseach
I feel I have a more well-rounded understanding of what I am trying to do. By looking more in depth at my sources, I have been able to find similarities, and I have also been able to contrast how different they are based on what medium they were found in.
I think the most interesting thing about all of my research and analyzing has been seeing the commonalities in my sources. Big markets or small ones, they common themes continue to exist. I think that is especially cool because I am a TCU student, and seeing your school being represented in the local media like it is in national media is exciting.
Unbiased, it is amazing what a few good years can do for a program, and to see how much attention is paid to a particular program is astonishing. It takes a great deal of time and work to be recognized, but only a split second to be forgotten about.
I feel I have some great stuff, and I think it is more than substantial to get my point across.
I think the most interesting thing about all of my research and analyzing has been seeing the commonalities in my sources. Big markets or small ones, they common themes continue to exist. I think that is especially cool because I am a TCU student, and seeing your school being represented in the local media like it is in national media is exciting.
Unbiased, it is amazing what a few good years can do for a program, and to see how much attention is paid to a particular program is astonishing. It takes a great deal of time and work to be recognized, but only a split second to be forgotten about.
I feel I have some great stuff, and I think it is more than substantial to get my point across.
Wednesday, February 25, 2009
In class writing on research (pre-writing)
Some concerns I have about my research:
My main concern is that my sources might be a little too similar. But, I think the similarities are okay because the differences lie in how my topic is covered in the different areas of the media.
I feel like I could have a few more specific sources related to my topic as well.
However, I do feel satisfied with what I have, and I think it will make for a solid paper. Although the information is similar, the way it is presented and covered is definitely different.
Four Questions:
I feel like all of my sources are primary because they come from the media. My topic is analyzing how TCU football is covered in the media, and all my sources stem from that.
I chose my sources because they cover college, local, and national mediums. I have one from the TCU Daily Skiff, two from ESPN.com, and one from the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. They cover all the bases so to speak, and they are all geared toward what I am trying to argue.
I narrowed my topic to how TCU was covered during the signing of recruits process, and the aftermath of that. All of the sources focus on that, and they evaluate how TCU did in regard to other schools. In different ways, they all explain how TCU is no longer the David in the fight...they are becoming the Goliath.
All sources had legitimate factual and statistical evidence to support the ranging opinions made about why TCU has potential to do some damage next year. No where in any of these sources was there rambling and nonsense. It was all good opinions that had sufficient back up to the claims the different authors were making.
My main concern is that my sources might be a little too similar. But, I think the similarities are okay because the differences lie in how my topic is covered in the different areas of the media.
I feel like I could have a few more specific sources related to my topic as well.
However, I do feel satisfied with what I have, and I think it will make for a solid paper. Although the information is similar, the way it is presented and covered is definitely different.
Four Questions:
I feel like all of my sources are primary because they come from the media. My topic is analyzing how TCU football is covered in the media, and all my sources stem from that.
I chose my sources because they cover college, local, and national mediums. I have one from the TCU Daily Skiff, two from ESPN.com, and one from the Fort Worth Star-Telegram. They cover all the bases so to speak, and they are all geared toward what I am trying to argue.
I narrowed my topic to how TCU was covered during the signing of recruits process, and the aftermath of that. All of the sources focus on that, and they evaluate how TCU did in regard to other schools. In different ways, they all explain how TCU is no longer the David in the fight...they are becoming the Goliath.
All sources had legitimate factual and statistical evidence to support the ranging opinions made about why TCU has potential to do some damage next year. No where in any of these sources was there rambling and nonsense. It was all good opinions that had sufficient back up to the claims the different authors were making.
Research Experiences
After looking through various databases and doing many google searches, I can say that I have found some very good primary sources for my paper. My topic concerns how the various mediums cover TCU football. I narrowed it down to signing day and recent recruiting, and I was able to find articles in the college, local, and national news. It was interesting seeing the differences.
The Daily Skiff makes signing day front page news, where as ESPN and the Fort Worth Star-Telegram do not. This is understandable, but a difference nonetheless. ESPN has always covered TCU to an extent, but due to the recent success, the coverage has grown enormously.
I see a common theme of TCU becoming a premier player in recruiting. No longer are they red-headed step child of Texas football. They do not just pick over the leftovers. They are beginning to get some top recruits fresh out of the oven. This was made clear in all of the mediums I researched.
The Daily Skiff makes signing day front page news, where as ESPN and the Fort Worth Star-Telegram do not. This is understandable, but a difference nonetheless. ESPN has always covered TCU to an extent, but due to the recent success, the coverage has grown enormously.
I see a common theme of TCU becoming a premier player in recruiting. No longer are they red-headed step child of Texas football. They do not just pick over the leftovers. They are beginning to get some top recruits fresh out of the oven. This was made clear in all of the mediums I researched.
Tuesday, February 17, 2009
My Topic for Unit II: Rhetorical Case Study
My topic is going to consist of how the TCU football team is covered in various media. Specifically, I will compare and contrast from a local and national level. Mediums that fit this requirement could/will include the TCU Daily Skiff, the Fort Worth Star Telegram, ESPN, USA Today, etc.
This idea/topic concerns my major of broadcast journalism, and it fits well with one of my main interests: sports. I feel taking it local, focusing on TCU football, it will even be more exciting. There have been so many stories already about recruiting classes, expectations for next season, and much more that could help me out with finding primary sources for this paper. I definitely think I could have fun with this topic, and I do not think I would be bored to tears after five weeks of this.
This idea/topic concerns my major of broadcast journalism, and it fits well with one of my main interests: sports. I feel taking it local, focusing on TCU football, it will even be more exciting. There have been so many stories already about recruiting classes, expectations for next season, and much more that could help me out with finding primary sources for this paper. I definitely think I could have fun with this topic, and I do not think I would be bored to tears after five weeks of this.
Sunday, February 15, 2009
Author's Note for Final Draft and Portfolio
I feel my final draft is my best draft because I have made the necessary revisions to form the most effective, cohesive paper. With all of the peer reviews, drafts, observations, etc., I have been able to make many changes, and all have made my paper better. The biggest improvements I made concerned analysis and description. I had a lot of description and analysis in my paper, but with the teacher and peer reviews, I saw, from their comments, what I was lacking. It was not anything major, but by adding two or three sentences about this area or that area, I made my paper that much stronger. After organizing everything in my portfolio, I can see how much work i have put into this paper, and I think all that work shows in my final copy.
It has been a lengthy process, but definitely a necessary one. Each draft brought out a better paper, and now, after probably the fourth or fifth draft, I know I do have my best work ready to be turned in. All the steps along the way have made that possible, and more importantly, easier.
It has been a lengthy process, but definitely a necessary one. Each draft brought out a better paper, and now, after probably the fourth or fifth draft, I know I do have my best work ready to be turned in. All the steps along the way have made that possible, and more importantly, easier.
Tuesday, February 10, 2009
Feedback and Revisions
Cameron and Lacy read over my paper, and their suggestions were very similar. Both suggested that I should add more description about the colors of the sections of the library, and what is exactly going on. What is the cafe like, and what are the frog pods like in the loud section are two things I could elaborate on. I see this as something I will do in my paper; in addition to adding on to both of these things, I plan on adding more description as a whole. Although I do not feel my paper is general or bland, I do think I could go more in detail, describing more of what each area is like. Colors, sounds, smells, and so on, could all enhance the quality of my paper. They both had many good things to say. Lacy liked how what I was trying to get across was presented in one sentence. Both Cameron and Lacy thought some of my examples about behavior in the library were accurate and funny.
Overall, I think fine-tuning and painting more of a picture for my audience are the two pressing things I need to do. By doing both, I think my paper will be much more explosive and entertaining. I think I have some great stuff to work with, and I think the peer reviews were a great help.
Overall, I think fine-tuning and painting more of a picture for my audience are the two pressing things I need to do. By doing both, I think my paper will be much more explosive and entertaining. I think I have some great stuff to work with, and I think the peer reviews were a great help.
Thursday, February 5, 2009
Author's Note for Draft 1
In my first draft, I am trying to get my ideas out on paper, in a fairly organized way, and I try to make it as complete as possible. I would like help seeing what else needs to be addressed in my paper, style/grammar critiques, and overall flow of the paper. I feel like I am best at getting it all out, then going back and fine-tuning here and there.
Wednesday, February 4, 2009
What the Library Means to the Community
The TCU library plays a huge role for the TCU and surrounding communities. It is not only a place to go and study for tests or in between classes, but it is a place where students can socialize with each other. The resources provided, like books, computers, DVDs, make our (students) lives so much easier. As some students have told me, since the BLUU is so far away, the library is taking the place of the main, as a place where you can go to kill time in between classes. I have to agree. It is a place to gather, hang out, and occasionally it's a place where students get work done.
Monday, February 2, 2009
Annotated Notes
Unit 1 Annotated Notes
I did my first observation on January 30, between 10:00 a.m. and 11:00 a.m. I started in the café area, and there were around seven people there. Some were studying, chatting, or waiting in line for a snack. Only three were actually studying. I actually saw my professor talking with a friend, and one person was on the phone the entire time I was in this section. I feel like this space offers an atypical study environment in that you are not barricaded in a room or sitting at a desk. There are café tables, TVs, and food to create a coffee shop feel, and with so many people coming in and out, you do not feel as though you are “studying.” Food and drinks offer a break to those in this area, and the computers in there allow you to research if you need something else for your studies. Also, this is somewhere you can eat and not feel self-conscious about it. In other areas you might feel you are being to loud or bothersome, but for those in this area, they felt none of that.
Next, I visited the loud section, and there were around 50 students studying, at the computers, meeting in groups, or getting help at the computer desk. It was a bit quieter than usual, but being early on a Friday, that was understandable. It was funny to see what those on the computers were doing because many were not doing work. People were looking at Facebook, ESPN.com, and many other non-educational sites. This area offers more meeting and study space, and a nice escape/resource with the computers. It is a quick in and out for students coming in between classes to print something off, and in this area, you can really do any type of work. The pods offer a place to do group projects, and with so many different places to study (at the computers, tables, pods, lounge chairs, etc.), the environment suits any studier. Also, while I was there, I saw a guy recognize a classmate, and they began to work on homework together. They were probably meeting each other there, but that is a big plus for this area. It serves as a great place to meet because there are so many resources available for whatever you might be working on.
Lastly, I went to the quiet section. Around 20 people were in there, all were studying. I think this is definitely the most typical “studying” place. There are some lounge chairs, but mostly it is filled with desks, and dividers for intense studying. Sitting there, I found it a little more difficult to focus, and I noticed that was true for others because every sound and ruffle of a paper can be heard. There is virtually no noise, so when something happens, everyone can hear it. Someone was eating, and you could tell the others were not happy about it. For those who come here, complete focus and no distractions is what they seek. It is ironic too because I think in some ways, they get the exact opposite. The littlest sound can throw you off, and it can really create a distraction. The basement is even more secluded and quiet. The quiet section definitely has the biggest “library” feel out of the three areas.
My second observation occurred on Sunday, February 1 from 11:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m. I started in the café again, and there were about eight students in there. Only two were actually studying though. Two were playing chess, and the others were talking or waiting in line for snacks. This was only a few hours after the Super Bowl, so for a Sunday night, the library was quieter than usual. But there was not too much studying going on in this area. The café is more of a social space than anything else, and it helps those who like the commotion and people going back and forth. It is a place people can go and feel like they are doing something to get work done. Many have problems studying in their rooms or at their houses, so by going to the library, they are actually feeling like they are doing something, and getting their work done at the same time. However, in this area, that can become a problem because people often get distracted and socialize more than study.
Next I went to the loud section, and here I was able to talk to a student about her library experiences and how/why she chooses the library. She prefers the loud section over any other sections because it offers a background noise that can be blocked out with music, and it helps her focus more. For her, it is a happy medium between the too noisy café, and the too quiet section. She will go to the café to meet people and converse, but not to study. She does feel that the loud section can become too noisy, but she thinks the 24 hour operation has helped spread out how many are there at the same time. She cannot study at her house because she gets too distracted, so the library is good because it creates a study mindset for her. She also talked about how much time she would kill between classes, and she sees this more of an occurrence this year than in the past. With the main gone, this is really the most central place to go, and it provides easy access for those who are off campus to meet with others. She also thought it helps her and others going here because it does feel like you are doing something and also getting your work done, sometimes. She definitely agreed that at times she has come to just socialize and sees that others do that as well. The rest of the loud section was not too loud, probably because of the Super Bowl. Many either did their work earlier, at home, or did not do it at all.
Finally, the quiet section was just that Sunday night. Only about ten students were studying, and all were either studying or reading. No noise was acceptable. This is definitely for the hardcore studier, and the simplest noise gets everyone worked up. It works for some, but for me, it would not be an option.
I did my first observation on January 30, between 10:00 a.m. and 11:00 a.m. I started in the café area, and there were around seven people there. Some were studying, chatting, or waiting in line for a snack. Only three were actually studying. I actually saw my professor talking with a friend, and one person was on the phone the entire time I was in this section. I feel like this space offers an atypical study environment in that you are not barricaded in a room or sitting at a desk. There are café tables, TVs, and food to create a coffee shop feel, and with so many people coming in and out, you do not feel as though you are “studying.” Food and drinks offer a break to those in this area, and the computers in there allow you to research if you need something else for your studies. Also, this is somewhere you can eat and not feel self-conscious about it. In other areas you might feel you are being to loud or bothersome, but for those in this area, they felt none of that.
Next, I visited the loud section, and there were around 50 students studying, at the computers, meeting in groups, or getting help at the computer desk. It was a bit quieter than usual, but being early on a Friday, that was understandable. It was funny to see what those on the computers were doing because many were not doing work. People were looking at Facebook, ESPN.com, and many other non-educational sites. This area offers more meeting and study space, and a nice escape/resource with the computers. It is a quick in and out for students coming in between classes to print something off, and in this area, you can really do any type of work. The pods offer a place to do group projects, and with so many different places to study (at the computers, tables, pods, lounge chairs, etc.), the environment suits any studier. Also, while I was there, I saw a guy recognize a classmate, and they began to work on homework together. They were probably meeting each other there, but that is a big plus for this area. It serves as a great place to meet because there are so many resources available for whatever you might be working on.
Lastly, I went to the quiet section. Around 20 people were in there, all were studying. I think this is definitely the most typical “studying” place. There are some lounge chairs, but mostly it is filled with desks, and dividers for intense studying. Sitting there, I found it a little more difficult to focus, and I noticed that was true for others because every sound and ruffle of a paper can be heard. There is virtually no noise, so when something happens, everyone can hear it. Someone was eating, and you could tell the others were not happy about it. For those who come here, complete focus and no distractions is what they seek. It is ironic too because I think in some ways, they get the exact opposite. The littlest sound can throw you off, and it can really create a distraction. The basement is even more secluded and quiet. The quiet section definitely has the biggest “library” feel out of the three areas.
My second observation occurred on Sunday, February 1 from 11:00 p.m. to 12:00 a.m. I started in the café again, and there were about eight students in there. Only two were actually studying though. Two were playing chess, and the others were talking or waiting in line for snacks. This was only a few hours after the Super Bowl, so for a Sunday night, the library was quieter than usual. But there was not too much studying going on in this area. The café is more of a social space than anything else, and it helps those who like the commotion and people going back and forth. It is a place people can go and feel like they are doing something to get work done. Many have problems studying in their rooms or at their houses, so by going to the library, they are actually feeling like they are doing something, and getting their work done at the same time. However, in this area, that can become a problem because people often get distracted and socialize more than study.
Next I went to the loud section, and here I was able to talk to a student about her library experiences and how/why she chooses the library. She prefers the loud section over any other sections because it offers a background noise that can be blocked out with music, and it helps her focus more. For her, it is a happy medium between the too noisy café, and the too quiet section. She will go to the café to meet people and converse, but not to study. She does feel that the loud section can become too noisy, but she thinks the 24 hour operation has helped spread out how many are there at the same time. She cannot study at her house because she gets too distracted, so the library is good because it creates a study mindset for her. She also talked about how much time she would kill between classes, and she sees this more of an occurrence this year than in the past. With the main gone, this is really the most central place to go, and it provides easy access for those who are off campus to meet with others. She also thought it helps her and others going here because it does feel like you are doing something and also getting your work done, sometimes. She definitely agreed that at times she has come to just socialize and sees that others do that as well. The rest of the loud section was not too loud, probably because of the Super Bowl. Many either did their work earlier, at home, or did not do it at all.
Finally, the quiet section was just that Sunday night. Only about ten students were studying, and all were either studying or reading. No noise was acceptable. This is definitely for the hardcore studier, and the simplest noise gets everyone worked up. It works for some, but for me, it would not be an option.
Arguments of Fact and Definition for Space
I felt like there were many arguments of definition in the library. By designating certain areas as loud or quiet, students know where to go if they want to be in either environment. It is not necessarily an argument of fact, but it is understood that when students enter the library, certain areas are going to be louder or quieter because the library has defined them as such.
Also, when a student enters a specific area, his/her definition of loud or quiet is definitely different from someone elses definiton. So, that is an addition to this argument these spaces are making in the library.
Also, when a student enters a specific area, his/her definition of loud or quiet is definitely different from someone elses definiton. So, that is an addition to this argument these spaces are making in the library.
Sunday, February 1, 2009
The Library
I observed my space on two different occasions, and most of what I thought about the library was confirmed. It is a big social gathering place, but students do still find ways to get things done while there. Talking with a student, I gathered some interesting information, and she also had some great insight on a few things. One, because the main is gone, and the BLUU is so far away, the library is the only real big meeting place. So, students go there in between classes and to meet up with others more this year than before. I found that to be an interesting observation. Also, my idea that the library is kind of a one stop shop in that it has something for everyone, was confirmed by her as well. All in all, it was fun to see how many people were doing different things in one place. From the cafe to the quiet and loud sections, everyone was doing something...how productive they were is a completely different story.
Tuesday, January 27, 2009
Space Proposal
I plan to analyze and observe the TCU library over the next week. It will serve as my space for the Unit essay. I chose this space because I think it has a lot to offer. It is interesting to see the many functions the library provides for students. Of course, TCU students can go and work on projects, do homework, and access many databases for papers and other projects they have to do. Perhaps the most interesting function the library serves is as a social one. So many people go to the library to meet up with others, chat, and do everything but study.
I plan on going to the library multiple times over the course of the next week to observe both the library and those going in and out of it. I think the best times to observe are in the middle of the day, between 12 p.m. and 3 p.m. During these times you see a different group of people than you would between 9 p.m. and 3 a.m. So, over the next few days, I plan on going to the library to observe during these time periods, and see how much the 24 hour operation is affecting those who go to the library. The best days are during the week, so I will probably go Wednesday and Thursday night, and earlier on Friday. I will probably close out my observing session on Sunday night because that is when many of the procrastinators shine.
I already see and believe the library to be a space which is more suited for socialization than getting work done. I know there are those who do get a fair amount of work done while they spend their time at the library, but I feel more lean toward choosing other places to go study and actually do work than the library. I also feel the older you are, the more you feel inclined to go study somewhere else because you have experienced how tough it can be to get things done at the library. Younger students have yet to discover this and/or realize it and like to go to socialize anyway.
It will be interesting to see after observing and even talking with students if my thoughts are the majority. I feel it will be a good experience nonetheless.
I plan on going to the library multiple times over the course of the next week to observe both the library and those going in and out of it. I think the best times to observe are in the middle of the day, between 12 p.m. and 3 p.m. During these times you see a different group of people than you would between 9 p.m. and 3 a.m. So, over the next few days, I plan on going to the library to observe during these time periods, and see how much the 24 hour operation is affecting those who go to the library. The best days are during the week, so I will probably go Wednesday and Thursday night, and earlier on Friday. I will probably close out my observing session on Sunday night because that is when many of the procrastinators shine.
I already see and believe the library to be a space which is more suited for socialization than getting work done. I know there are those who do get a fair amount of work done while they spend their time at the library, but I feel more lean toward choosing other places to go study and actually do work than the library. I also feel the older you are, the more you feel inclined to go study somewhere else because you have experienced how tough it can be to get things done at the library. Younger students have yet to discover this and/or realize it and like to go to socialize anyway.
It will be interesting to see after observing and even talking with students if my thoughts are the majority. I feel it will be a good experience nonetheless.
Monday, January 26, 2009
Local Community Spaces
Some of my favorite local hangouts include the Pour House, Fuzzys, Buffalo Bros, and Buffalo Wild Wings. Although I am not 21, the Pour House is an awesome place to go watch football on Sunday afternoon. I love going there to watch my Green Bay Packers and many other teams. Fuzzys is a ton of fun, and it is so close to campus that it provides an easy way to get a group together and go out for a bite to eat. Buffalo cubed (Wings and Bros) serve the same purpose: Good food and a great place to go watch TCU or any other sporting event.
Two places that really do not fit in with the previously mentioned hangouts are the TCU library and the TCU rec center. These are hangouts for me as well, but in a very different sense. I like to go to the gym and work out, play racquetball, basketball, among other things. It serves as a tremendous stress release, and I do spend a great deal of my time there. The library used to be a hangout for me freshman year in the sense that I always went there to "study." I found out that I never really got too much done while I was there because so many people come to the library to socialize instead of study. I have been guilty of this too, but nevertheless, I have learned if I want to actually get work done, a coffee shop or even my room is a better choice.
Two places that really do not fit in with the previously mentioned hangouts are the TCU library and the TCU rec center. These are hangouts for me as well, but in a very different sense. I like to go to the gym and work out, play racquetball, basketball, among other things. It serves as a tremendous stress release, and I do spend a great deal of my time there. The library used to be a hangout for me freshman year in the sense that I always went there to "study." I found out that I never really got too much done while I was there because so many people come to the library to socialize instead of study. I have been guilty of this too, but nevertheless, I have learned if I want to actually get work done, a coffee shop or even my room is a better choice.
Tuesday, January 20, 2009
Argument With Rhetorical Appeals
I picked a sports piece that ran a few years ago. Although older, it was so powerful when I saw it that it was the first thing that came to mind, and I felt like it hit all appeals perfectly. The piece, which can be found at http://espn.go.com/video/clip?categoryid=3060647&id=3066192, is about Jason Ray. Ray was the University of North Carolina mascot, and during the NCAA basketball tournament, he was struck by a car while walking to get some food. He died a few days later, but he was no where near done helping people. Ray was a good, well-rounded, extroverted person who tried to help as many people as he could, and because he was an organ donor, his help continued after his death. To this day, people are still alive because of the organs and tissues Ray provided.
I think the most obvious and well-used appeal in this story is pathos. The emotion spills out everywhere in the package, comes right through the screen and hits you with such force. The first time I watched it, I was brought to tears. It evokes so much emotion, and you feel so bad that someone so wonderful died so young, but you also feel joy that so many were saved because of his sacrifice. The interviews, shots, and pictures all do their part to make the pathos appeal so present and relevant in this story.
I feel ethos and logos are overshadowed by pathos, but nevertheless are represented. The ethos is in the reporter reporting and those she interviewed. Lisa Salters is a veteran reporter for ESPN, and I definitely trusted her and saw her as extremely credible. She backed that up with all the angles she covered in this fourteen and a half minute story. Those interviewed ranged from the Jason's parents, to those who received his organs and even the head coach of UNC, Roy Williams. She did a very good job at covering all of the bases, which further added to her credibility.
Logos was an integral part to the story as well because some of the facts mentioned were extremely powerful and shocking. One talked about how many people were helped from his death. Around 50 people were helped from his body. Those living today are carrying a piece of him with them, and he lives on through them. The other huge purpose logos served was telling the stories of those who received organs from Jason. How hard and long their path had been before Jason saved them was unbelievable.
All in all, this story uses all of the appeals in different ways, and it not only grabs your attention, but it makes you care. It has the power to evoke change. Who knows how many people might have become donors because of having seen this story. You know your story is important and truly meaningful when so much power radiates from it.
I think the most obvious and well-used appeal in this story is pathos. The emotion spills out everywhere in the package, comes right through the screen and hits you with such force. The first time I watched it, I was brought to tears. It evokes so much emotion, and you feel so bad that someone so wonderful died so young, but you also feel joy that so many were saved because of his sacrifice. The interviews, shots, and pictures all do their part to make the pathos appeal so present and relevant in this story.
I feel ethos and logos are overshadowed by pathos, but nevertheless are represented. The ethos is in the reporter reporting and those she interviewed. Lisa Salters is a veteran reporter for ESPN, and I definitely trusted her and saw her as extremely credible. She backed that up with all the angles she covered in this fourteen and a half minute story. Those interviewed ranged from the Jason's parents, to those who received his organs and even the head coach of UNC, Roy Williams. She did a very good job at covering all of the bases, which further added to her credibility.
Logos was an integral part to the story as well because some of the facts mentioned were extremely powerful and shocking. One talked about how many people were helped from his death. Around 50 people were helped from his body. Those living today are carrying a piece of him with them, and he lives on through them. The other huge purpose logos served was telling the stories of those who received organs from Jason. How hard and long their path had been before Jason saved them was unbelievable.
All in all, this story uses all of the appeals in different ways, and it not only grabs your attention, but it makes you care. It has the power to evoke change. Who knows how many people might have become donors because of having seen this story. You know your story is important and truly meaningful when so much power radiates from it.
Wednesday, January 14, 2009
Chapter 1: Is everything an argument
I thought it was interesting that you can have so many different types of arguments. I have had my fair share of arguments, but I never really stopped and thought about what category they fell under. The author(s) do a great job at convincing the reader that everything really can be an argument because if you break down each situation, sign, statement, etc., there is some sort of reason behind everything. Most people, like me, might not go that in depth when considering if the choice of food they ate at lunch is an argument, but if you look close enough, it is. If I chose to eat a filling breakfast that included eggs and oatmeal, instead of a pop tart, I would be doing this because I thought the latter would not fill me up. They used so many examples that included simple thoughts that backed up many things they said.
As interesting as it was to hear how some of the simplest things or choices we make can be considered arguments, I thought it was a little much to think that every single thing I do is an argument. I respect their examples and reasoning, but I do not agree that every possible thing is an argument. Sometimes I choose to do something because I want to. It is something I feel. It could be playing a game, going to a movie, or eating at a restaurant. When I do these things, I do not take the time to consider other options, and rule things out, I choose what I do because that's what sounds good at the moment. I do not argue it against something else.
As interesting as it was to hear how some of the simplest things or choices we make can be considered arguments, I thought it was a little much to think that every single thing I do is an argument. I respect their examples and reasoning, but I do not agree that every possible thing is an argument. Sometimes I choose to do something because I want to. It is something I feel. It could be playing a game, going to a movie, or eating at a restaurant. When I do these things, I do not take the time to consider other options, and rule things out, I choose what I do because that's what sounds good at the moment. I do not argue it against something else.
Monday, January 12, 2009
Hello
My name is Kyle Arnold, and I am a junior at Texas Christian University. I am currently a broadcast journalism major with a criminal justice minor. I was born and raised in Austin, Texas, and I love it there. I try to go back home as much as possible, but I do love my new home in Fort Worth.
I am a huge sports fan, and I hope to get a job in sports journalism when I graduate. I root for the Houston Astros, Green Bay Packers, North Carolina Tar Heels, and of course, any TCU team. GO FROGS!
At TCU, I am involved with Frog Camp and FrogHouse, among other things. I am serving as a director for both programs this year, and I am extremely excited for the upcoming months where I will be crazy busy with these two programs. If you do not know much about either of the programs, feel free to ask me about what they are and/or how to get involved.
I did take this course because it is required for me to graduate; however, I hope to become a better writer when I am done with this course. As a broadcast journalism major, writing is kind of what I do. It is drastically different from writing papers for class, though there are some common guidelines. You always want to get the point across, regardless if you are writing an anchor script or a research paper; the main difference is when writing for TV, you have a limited amount of time to reach your audience. I am also a firm believer that one can always get better at writing, so no matter how good I think I am, I know I can get better.
I do a lot of TV and newspaper writing, and as a college student, I am constantly texting, emailing, and facebooking people. I feel as a journalism major, I have become faster at typing, and I owe that to basically doing all of my work on the computer. I like the journalism type of writing more so than the academic kind, filled with term papers and book reports, because I feel you can have more fun when writing a column or a TV script. Also, instead of just turning in a paper for a grade in class, my TV packages will go on TV, and my news stories will be published in newspapers. It's exciting to read something you wrote that anyone in the world can access.
My university involvement is strong, as I am a part of Frog Camp and FrogHouse. Through these programs, I am privileged enough to meet many of the new students coming to TCU. With this, a student's first impression is based on how well they liked the program I helped set up or how well he/she liked me. It is a huge responsibility, and it is a ton of fun at the same time.
My hometown of Austin, Texas is extremely important to me. I love it there, and for those who have visited this place, some think it is kind of weird (AND THAT IS THE WAY WE LIKE IT!). It is weird in the sense of you can find just about any type of person in Austin, and you can do many different types of things. It is a huge melting pot, and there is something for everyone in Austin. It is my home, and I am proud to say that.
Based on what I have read from the book and what I have said in my first post, I feel I am making an argument based on the type of person I am. By mentioning my activities and likes, I feel I have shown that I am a person who likes to be involved and likes to be active. I have voiced strong opinions when talking about my hometown and other things, but they have not been overbearing, be all end all type statements. As much as I love Austin, I understand if someone does not. That is kind of the main idea I have tried to incorporate in this first post is that I am open to a lot of different things, people, and ideas. I will draw my own conclusions and I have my own opinions, but I do respect other ideas and opinions. This also applies to how I plan to act and participate in this class. I like to make my voice heard, but I don't like to prevent others from doing the same.
I am a huge sports fan, and I hope to get a job in sports journalism when I graduate. I root for the Houston Astros, Green Bay Packers, North Carolina Tar Heels, and of course, any TCU team. GO FROGS!
At TCU, I am involved with Frog Camp and FrogHouse, among other things. I am serving as a director for both programs this year, and I am extremely excited for the upcoming months where I will be crazy busy with these two programs. If you do not know much about either of the programs, feel free to ask me about what they are and/or how to get involved.
I did take this course because it is required for me to graduate; however, I hope to become a better writer when I am done with this course. As a broadcast journalism major, writing is kind of what I do. It is drastically different from writing papers for class, though there are some common guidelines. You always want to get the point across, regardless if you are writing an anchor script or a research paper; the main difference is when writing for TV, you have a limited amount of time to reach your audience. I am also a firm believer that one can always get better at writing, so no matter how good I think I am, I know I can get better.
I do a lot of TV and newspaper writing, and as a college student, I am constantly texting, emailing, and facebooking people. I feel as a journalism major, I have become faster at typing, and I owe that to basically doing all of my work on the computer. I like the journalism type of writing more so than the academic kind, filled with term papers and book reports, because I feel you can have more fun when writing a column or a TV script. Also, instead of just turning in a paper for a grade in class, my TV packages will go on TV, and my news stories will be published in newspapers. It's exciting to read something you wrote that anyone in the world can access.
My university involvement is strong, as I am a part of Frog Camp and FrogHouse. Through these programs, I am privileged enough to meet many of the new students coming to TCU. With this, a student's first impression is based on how well they liked the program I helped set up or how well he/she liked me. It is a huge responsibility, and it is a ton of fun at the same time.
My hometown of Austin, Texas is extremely important to me. I love it there, and for those who have visited this place, some think it is kind of weird (AND THAT IS THE WAY WE LIKE IT!). It is weird in the sense of you can find just about any type of person in Austin, and you can do many different types of things. It is a huge melting pot, and there is something for everyone in Austin. It is my home, and I am proud to say that.
Based on what I have read from the book and what I have said in my first post, I feel I am making an argument based on the type of person I am. By mentioning my activities and likes, I feel I have shown that I am a person who likes to be involved and likes to be active. I have voiced strong opinions when talking about my hometown and other things, but they have not been overbearing, be all end all type statements. As much as I love Austin, I understand if someone does not. That is kind of the main idea I have tried to incorporate in this first post is that I am open to a lot of different things, people, and ideas. I will draw my own conclusions and I have my own opinions, but I do respect other ideas and opinions. This also applies to how I plan to act and participate in this class. I like to make my voice heard, but I don't like to prevent others from doing the same.
I have read the syllabus, and I understand and agree to all the terms and conditions in it.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
